Posted on May 19, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Another big Rail Yards announcement this morning: the Related Companies have stepped in where Tishman Speyer dropped out earlier this month. Related’s original proposal included the preservation of the entire High Line, including the spur over Tenth Avenue and the entire 30th Street section, which might have been demolished in Tishman Speyer’s plan. Though we haven’t [...]
Filed under: Rail Yards | Tagged: MTA, Rail Yards, Related | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 13, 2008 by Katie Lorah
After a last-ditch effort to get their West Side Rail Yards negotiations back on track after Thursday’s announcement, Tishman Speyer was unable to sway the MTA. The MTA’s statement today was short and sweet. In its entirety: The MTA met today with Tishman Speyer. Despite the best efforts of both sides, a final agreement could [...]
Filed under: MTA, Rail Yards, Tishman Speyer | Tagged: Developers, Durst/Vornado, MTA, Rail Yards, Tishman Speyer | Leave a Comment »
Posted on May 9, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Negotiations between the MTA and Tishman Speyer have collapsed, according to the MTA, following a request from the developer to change the terms under which the project would be financed, as well as the project schedule. An agreement on the 26-acre site could not be reached. Tishman Speyer was selected to develop the rail yards last month, after an [...]
Filed under: Rail Yards | Tagged: MTA, Rail Yards, Tishman Soeyer | 2 Comments »
Posted on March 26, 2008 by Katie Lorah
The MTA announced today that it has selected Tishman Speyer as the developer for the West Side Rail Yards. This announcement ends a 6-month bidding process, which originally involved 5 competing developers. Tishman Speyer outbid the only other remaining contender– a joint venture between the Durst Organization and Vornado Realty Trust– by $112 million, offering to pay $1.004 billion [...]
Filed under: Advocacy, Press, Rail Yards | Tagged: Advocacy, MTA, Neighborhood, Rail Yards, Tishman Speyer | 7 Comments »
Posted on February 27, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Brookfield Properties has announced they have not submitted a second bid for the Rail Yards site. Supplementary bids were due yesterday. Back in January, the MTA asked the five developers to submit supplementary materials supporting their ability to lease, not buy, the 26-acre site. None of this financial information was made public. Brookfield’s decision not [...]
Filed under: Brookfield, MTA | Tagged: Brookfield, Developers, MTA, New York Observer, New York Times | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 20, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Unsurprisingly in the wake of the subprime crisis and general market shakiness, much of the Rail Yards dialogue has turned away from design and towards financials. Of course, guessing is a bit tough, given the MTA’s refusal to make the financial bids public (which the HYCAC called for as part of its summary of top [...]
Filed under: MTA, Media, Related, Tishman Speyer | Tagged: Crain's, Financials, MTA, Related, Tishman Speyer | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 7, 2008 by Katie Lorah
The January 28 MTA letter to developers generated a bunch of speculation on what the new guidelines will mean for developers, and it’s been a busy week for the various other developments around the Yards. MTA Likely to Narrow Rail Yards Field (NYO The Real Estate) MTA Wants Rail Yards Developer Designated By April 1 (NYO [...]
Filed under: Media | Tagged: Crain's, Curbed, Developers, Javits, MTA, New York Observer, New York Post, Press, Real Deal | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 7, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Crain’s has the latest on an increasingly complicated set of requirements for developers, as outlined by the MTA in their January 28 letter. According to the article by Theresa Agovino, the winning developer will be contractually obligated to create a set of seperate funds that will go to the MTA for Rail Yards expenses and [...]
Filed under: Media | Tagged: Crain's, Developers, Financials, MTA | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 4, 2008 by Katie Lorah
Following up on Crains’ reporting last week, the Times reports this morning on bidding developers’ (anonymous) initial responses to the MTA’s request for new information (the Times reporter says ”new bids,” although that’s not how the MTA framed it) reflecting the transit authority’s desire to lease, rather than sell, the land. The article hints that the developers are chafing under the new [...]
Filed under: Media, Site Background | Tagged: MTA, New York Times | Leave a Comment »